Hotel
Spas as Independent Profit Centers | by Andrea Foster and Adam
Wohlberg
The
spa industry has become a major player in the hospitality sector
with spas appearing at resort and hotel properties at a remarkable
rate. The International SPA Association (iSPA) cited the existence
of over 1,662 resort/hotel spa properties as of 2004, a number
which has continued to grow into 2006. As the industry continues
to develop, spas are becoming independent profit centers, responsible
for providing detailed cost accounting to the hotel property and
justifying their existence with bottom line income.
With
the increasing number of resort spas and an emerging trend towards
consistent accounting metrics, patterns are emerging in the financial
data. In order to continue our investigation of these emerging
trends in the industry, we have analyzed the financial statements
of over 35 spas in resort properties and segmented the data by
the number of treatment rooms within the spa. The data used in
our analysis comes from Trends in the Hotel Industry, PKF Hospitality
Research’s database of over 5,000 hotel financial statements.
Included
in this study are resort hotels, which are defined as properties
where guests are offered full-service spa facilities as well as
extensive recreational activities such as golf and tennis. We
excluded from our analysis urban hotels and hotels offering only
limited massage services as part of an enhanced fitness club.
Spa
Revenue
The
data confirms a high correlation between the number of treatment
rooms and total spa revenue, as seen in the graph below.

Source:
PKF Consulting and PKF Hospitality Research
Clearly,
spas with more treatment rooms have a greater ability to generate
revenue. Of course, sufficient demand must be present to justify
the additional rooms. Merely building a large spa with dozens
of treatment rooms does not guarantee that demand from guests
will fill those rooms. However, if the demand is present, spas
with a larger number of treatment rooms are better able to capture
the demand that exists.
Due
to the cyclicality of demand in the spa industry, spas need an
adequate number of rooms to capture revenue during periods of
peak demand so as to cover costs during slower periods. Spa operators
are getting savvy to this fact with many of the resort properties
we contacted currently renovating their spa facilities to add
more treatment rooms. During periods of high demand, additional
guests can potentially be accommodated by offering treatments
in guest rooms or in outdoor cabanas, when weather permits. This,
however, does not provide the full “spaaah” experience that is
often the guest’s primary objective. During periods of low demand,
properties are encouraging local usage by offering value-added
services or discounts to local residents or spa members.
What
is RevPAT?
As
spas become independent profit centers, performance metrics typically
applied to hotels can be used to analyze the profitability of
a spa. Thus far, resort/hotel spa revenue has been calculated
primarily as a percentage of total hotel revenue. Consistent with
spas becoming independent profit centers, it is useful to look
at spa revenue per available treatment room per day, or RevPAT.
Hoteliers who are familiar with RevPAR will find this new performance
metric fairly intuitive. RevPAT is calculated simply by dividing
the total spa revenue by the number of treatment rooms in the
spa.
The
average RevPAT for the properties studied was $367 per day with
a range of $241 to $443 for all the properties studied. These
numbers may seem high in comparison with the familiar RevPAR (Revenue
Per Available Room) figures, especially for a treatment room that
is small in comparison to a hotel room (a typical massage room
is only 120 square feet or 10x12). However, unlike typical hotel
rooms, the treatment room can be rented out numerous times throughout
the day which contributes to a higher RevPAT. In fact, many spas
have reduced treatment times to 50 or 80 minutes rather than 60
or 90 minutes in order to do just this, provide more daily treatments
per room. Unlike hotel room revenue, though, there is a substantial
cost associated with each occupied treatment room in the form
of therapist labor expense. Less revenue filters to the bottom
line than from a hotel room as the labor expense captures a large
portion of the treatment room revenue. The exhibit below shows
the RevPAT by the number of treatment rooms for our data sample.

Source:
PKF Consulting and PKF Hospitality Research
RevPAT
is a measure of how well the spa has been able to fill rooms and
generate revenue from each treatment room. As can be seen in the
previous exhibit, RevPAT analysis reveals that some of the spas
in the 11 to 15 room range in our sample may have been overbuilt.
On the other hand, those spas with 6 to 10 rooms performed quite
well, bringing in as much revenue per treatment room as some of
the mega-spas with over 21 treatment rooms.
Spas
Operate like Mini-Hotels
For
many in the hotel industry, spa operations are seen as somewhat
mysterious, perhaps due to the esoteric nature of Reiki, Watsu®
and other types of bodywork. Certainly, proper design, aesthetics,
and the experiential elements of the spa services are perhaps
more essential to the success of a spa than to the success of
a hotel. However, some of the mystery around spa operations can
be dispelled by realizing that spas operate essentially like mini-hotels:
Both
spas and hotels have check-in and check-out processes at the front
desk
Both are service operations with high labor costs and extensive
staffing needs
Both are in the business of renting rooms for a duration of time
Both require extensive laundry and housekeeping services
Both have high fixed costs
The
most relevant similarity in our analysis is that the cost structure
of spas and hotels are similar, both with high fixed costs. This
similarity between spas and hotels helps to explain the higher
margins in large resort spas. As in any business with significant
overhead, a large amount of revenue needs to be earned to cover
the fixed costs of the operation; however, after this breakeven
point has been reached, the revenue from the additional rooms
flows to the bottom line at a greater rate. This is consistent
with the data in our analysis which showed that spas with a large
number of treatment rooms both brought in more revenue and, as
illustrated in the chart below, kept a higher percentage of each
dollar of revenue earned.

Source:
PKF Consulting and PKF Hospitality Research
Resort/hotel
spas have a significant advantage to profitability over stand-alone
spas. On the revenue side, many spas are primary demand generators
themselves, while others benefit from the demand base that has
already been generated to the hotel/resort property. On the expense
side, resort/hotel spas are able to share many fixed costs of
rent and marketing with the operating hotel property as a whole.
A free-standing day spa would have to bear such costs individually,
as many do not have the same extensive, and captured, demand base.
As a result, resort/hotel spas have the potential to operate more
profitably than their stand-alone day spa counterparts.
The
graph below shows both the revenue earned by the spas in our sample
as well as net operating income per available treatment room.

Source:
PKF Consulting and PKF Hospitality Research
As
noted before, hotel spas with a greater number of treatment rooms
operate more efficiently as indicated by the higher profit margin.
It is also interesting to note that these same large spa operations
generate more dollars per treatment room in net income.
The
Future of Hotel Spas: A Uniform System of Financial Reporting
Historically,
the major challenge in analyzing spa data has been the lack of
a uniform accounting system. Without this type of system, the
profitability of any individual spa was difficult to determine
and it has been even more difficult to establish benchmarks and
compare the performance of one spa to another. In addition, the
spa industry as a whole has suffered from a lack of a consistent
definition of what constitutes a spa. As a result, the financial
data from fitness centers with a single massage room were being
compared to the financial data from full-service spas offering
an extensive variety of treatments and spa amenities.
However,
a committee assembled by the International Spa Association (iSPA)
recently developed a Uniform System of Financial Reporting to
establish a standardized accounting system in the industry. As
more spas begin to implement these standardized accounting procedures,
it will become easier to establish industry benchmarks and compare
the profitability of spas. Although we have begun to see emerging
patterns in the financial data, the next few years will provide
a wealth of data from all the newly built spas being reported
according to a uniform system of accounts.
Andrea
Foster is an Associate in the Los Angeles office of PKF Consulting
(andrea.foster@pkfc.com). Adam Wohlberg is a candidate for the
Master of Management in Hospitality (MMH) degree, with a concentration
in the spa industry, at Cornell University. Robert Mandelbaum,
Director of Research Information Services of PKF Hospitality Research
in Atlanta, assisted in the preparation of the article.
To
learn more about the resort/hotel spa industry trends, design,
and spa operations, join Andrea Foster and her panel of spa experts
at the Resort Management Conference in Pinehurst, North Carolina
on March 20th 2006 (www.resortconference.com). To reach
Adam Wohlberg please email
adam@zendospa.com
Article
courtesy of